Mainnet Testnet
Settings
Gridcoinstats
You are on Polls Menu

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

Survey poll Closed Wallet verified checked
Transaction Raw transaction ← All polls

Community survey about https://grcbazaar.com/

Should developers keep, improve, or shut down GRCBazaar?

Counted by
Balance
Answers
Several choices
Began
Ended
Duration
28 days
Discussion
www.reddit.com/r/gridcoin/comments/1ui… ↗
Active vote weight share
23.23 %of the active vote weight voted
0 100 % of the active vote weight
The votes that counted add up to a vote weight of 27 969 047, of the 120 397 867 that could have voted (22.92 % of the supply).
Votes
276cast in the poll

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

Result

as of the end, block 4 039 986
The result is worked out from the chain as of the end of the poll (block 4 039 986), so it never changes afterwards, whatever is spent later.

5 answers · vote weight 27 969 047

1 Yes. Keep it and keep building it. I would use it. Winner 91.11 % 25 485 126.99 · 184 votes
2 Maybe. I would use it only if it were open source. 4.19 % 1 174 284.08 · 38 votes
3 I do not care either way. 3.80 % 1 065 288.97 · 23 votes
4 No. I would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 0.65 % 183 481.75 · 11 votes
5 No. I would not use it. It does not add enough value for the community. 0.21 % 60 865.10 · 7 votes
How a vote is weighed Balance

Only the balance counts.

vote weight=balance÷answers chosen
balance
the GRC held by the outputs the vote names; 1 GRC is 1 of vote weight
answers chosen
how many answers the vote picked; each gets its share of the weight

Weight over the poll

The weight that counted, added up per answer as the votes came in

0 10M 20M 30M 2026-06-29 2026-07-13 2026-07-27 2026-06-29: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 2 965 282, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 17 067, i do not care either way. 0, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 18 713, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 0 2026-06-30: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 7 711 176, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 145 816, i do not care either way. 129 212, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 59 870, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 6 304 2026-07-01: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 8 079 570, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 170 705, i do not care either way. 135 579, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 110 853, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 44 941 2026-07-02: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 8 239 746, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 170 800, i do not care either way. 196 935, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 110 853, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 49 322 2026-07-03: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 8 979 664, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 171 659, i do not care either way. 241 520, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 110 853, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 49 322 2026-07-04: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 9 451 248, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 233 920, i do not care either way. 335 387, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 112 434, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 49 322 2026-07-05: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 11 640 881, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 235 211, i do not care either way. 338 126, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 112 434, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 49 322 2026-07-06: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 11 729 282, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 235 211, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 114 088, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 50 976 2026-07-07: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 12 331 807, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 371 340, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 079, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 51 639 2026-07-08: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 16 629 121, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 372 752, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 079, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 51 639 2026-07-09: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 19 203 521, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 395 324, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-10: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 19 808 330, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 512 189, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-11: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 19 869 203, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 512 189, i do not care either way. 410 154, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-12: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 19 948 743, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 958 393, i do not care either way. 596 977, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-13: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 20 105 545, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 958 405, i do not care either way. 596 977, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-14: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 20 120 565, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 012 147, i do not care either way. 596 977, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 705, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-15: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 20 342 267, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 012 147, i do not care either way. 596 977, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 721, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-16: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 21 236 829, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 012 147, i do not care either way. 686 412, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 721, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-17: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 21 308 573, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 031 641, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 118 721, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-18: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 21 345 147, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 068 609, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-19: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 21 400 115, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 068 609, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 52 265 2026-07-20: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 21 637 864, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 068 609, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-21: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 299 355, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 068 609, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-22: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 542 586, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 068 609, i do not care either way. 1 003 908, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-23: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 542 586, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 074 080, i do not care either way. 1 021 036, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-24: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 740 957, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 120 078, i do not care either way. 1 022 819, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 124 030, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-25: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 893 356, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 128 522, i do not care either way. 1 022 819, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 183 482, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-26: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 22 957 613, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 128 522, i do not care either way. 1 065 289, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 183 482, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865 2026-07-27: yes. keep it and keep building it. i would use it. 25 485 127, maybe. i would use it only if it were open source. 1 174 284, i do not care either way. 1 065 289, no. i would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 183 482, no. i would not use it. it does not add enough value for the community. 60 865
At the end: Yes. Keep it and keep building it. I would use it. 25 485 127Maybe. I would use it only if it were open source. 1 174 284I do not care either way. 1 065 289No. I would not use it because of legal, tax, fraud, or compliance risk. 183 482No. I would not use it. It does not add enough value for the community. 60 865

Votes

0
A voter can vote again. Votes are counted newest first: an output counts once, for the newest vote that claims it, and a CPID's magnitude counts once. An older vote that still has an output the newer ones did not claim is Superseded (partial) and counts with what is left; one with nothing left is Superseded and counts for nothing. The weight shown is what counted.
The votes of the poll: partial
AnswerVoter VotedOutputs named Balance (GRC)Magnitude Vote weightOf the poll The vote
No votes to show.

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

Advertisement

We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

No ad to show here right now. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.

The ads are blocked in your browser. We understand ads are no fun, but they are what makes Gridcoinstats possible.